[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: rsh fallback to rlogin?

To: Assar Westerlund <assar@sics.se>
Subject: Re: rsh fallback to rlogin?
From: Magnus Holmberg <mho@era-a.ericsson.se>
Date: Tue, 11 May 1999 16:56:43 +0200
cc: heimdal-discuss@sics.se
In-reply-to: Your message of 09 May 1999 13:44:55 +0200. <5ln1ze4gco.fsf@assaris.sics.se>
Sender: owner-heimdal-discuss@sics.se

In message <5ln1ze4gco.fsf@assaris.sics.se>, Assar Westerlund writes:
>Does anybody really care any longer about the traditional
>functionality of rsh falling back to calling rlogin when given no
>command?  Otherwise, it's not going to get implemented in heimdal rsh.

I think yes. It seems like most people never calls rlogin directly, just
'rsh host'.

	- mho
--
Magnus Holmberg, UNIX support			     mho@era-a.ericsson.se
Tel 71713						mho@stacken.kth.se

Follow-Ups:
- Re: rsh fallback to rlogin?
  - From: Assar Westerlund <assar@sics.se>

References:
- rsh fallback to rlogin?
  - From: Assar Westerlund <assar@sics.se>

Prev by Date: Re: rcp
Next by Date: Re: rsh fallback to rlogin?
Prev by thread: rsh fallback to rlogin?
Next by thread: Re: rsh fallback to rlogin?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread