Re: rd_priv timestamp checking and kpasswdd

[Derrick J Brashear <shadow@dementia.org>]

On 9 Aug 2000, Johan Danielsson wrote:

> Derrick J Brashear <shadow@dementia.org> writes:
> 
> > I mean they are NULL, e.g. not *part.timestamp is 0, but
> > part.timestamp = 0.
> 
> Ok.  We set that flag unconditionally in auth_con_init.
> 
> What is the correct thing to do here? Is it ok to accept messages
> without a timestamp? 

I'm not pleased about it, but I don't see what else I can do if the Win2k
dialog is going to work.

> Should it be configurable (apparently it has to be)?

I guess so; At the rd_priv level (libdefaults) or by specifying it for
kpasswdd?

-D