[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: static libraries

To: Brian May <bmay@csse.monash.edu.au>
Subject: Re: static libraries
From: Derrick J Brashear <shadow@dementia.org>
Date: Fri, 6 Oct 2000 18:36:27 -0400 (EDT)
cc: Heimdal list <heimdal-discuss@sics.se>
In-Reply-To: <x3rg0mc83ne.fsf@lyell.csse.monash.edu.au>
Sender: owner-heimdal-discuss@sics.se

On 5 Oct 2000, Brian May wrote:

> Hello,
> 
> Is it legal to have a static library within a static library?
> 
> If so, I have found a bug in Debian's strip command, as it
> doesn't work properly in this case.
> 
> If not, I have found a bug in libtool, as supplied with Heimdal 0.3c,
> as it generates libss.a and libsl.a both containing libeditline.a
> 
> I am unsure where to file the bug...

I submitted a fix, but no one commented.

-D

References:
- static libraries
  - From: Brian May <bmay@csse.monash.edu.au>

Prev by Date: PAM bashing (was Re: kerberos support in ssh/lsh)
Next by Date: Heimdal krb5 libs vs. MIT libs
Prev by thread: Re: static libraries
Next by thread: Authentication troubles between NetBSD kerberosIV and Heimdal
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread