[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: libsl, libss, vs e2fs libss

To: heimdal-discuss@sics.se
Subject: Re: libsl, libss, vs e2fs libss
From: Brian May <bam@snoopy.apana.org.au>
Date: 10 Nov 2000 12:44:10 +1100
In-Reply-To: Derrick J Brashear's message of "Thu, 09 Nov 2000 11:02:16 -0500"
References: <138310000.973785736@skittlebrau.trafford.dementia.org>
Sender: owner-heimdal-discuss@sics.se
User-Agent: Gnus/5.0807 (Gnus v5.8.7) XEmacs/21.1 (Capitol Reef)

>>>>> "Derrick" == Derrick J Brashear <shadow@dementia.org> writes:

    Derrick> Aside from run time library issues since your libss wants
    Derrick> libeditline and a termcap library the only issue should
    Derrick> be "use the mk_cmds that corresponds to the libss you
    Derrick> use"

As far as I can tell, the Heimdal build process never calls mk_cmds...

Or, should I run it manually? If so, how?

Brian May <bam@snoopy.apana.org.au>

Follow-Ups:
- Re: libsl, libss, vs e2fs libss
  - From: Derrick J Brashear <shadow@dementia.org>

References:
- Re: libsl, libss, vs e2fs libss
  - From: Derrick J Brashear <shadow@dementia.org>

Prev by Date: Re: redhat kerberos PAM
Next by Date: Re: redhat kerberos PAM
Prev by thread: Re: libsl, libss, vs e2fs libss
Next by thread: Re: libsl, libss, vs e2fs libss
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread