Re: Bad interraction between krb5_context and krb5_ccache

[GOMBAS Gabor <gombasg@inf.elte.hu>]

On Wed, Nov 15, 2000 at 04:57:06PM +0100, Johan Danielsson wrote:

> I think this is an error. You shouldn't use a cache if the context has
> been destroyed.

What about file caches when the cache is initialized in one process and
is used in another process? The context got destroyed when the first
process died long ago...

If there is an abstract cache layer (and it's there) I think consistent
behaviour should be provided for both file and memory caches. File caches
_do_ survive if the context gets destroyed (in fact, it is the normal case
for them), so memory caches should survive it too.

Gabor

-- 
Gabor Gombas                                       Eotvos Lorand University
E-mail: gombasg@inf.elte.hu                        Hungary