[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Enforcing encryption

To: heimdal-discuss@sics.se
Subject: Re: Enforcing encryption
From: Brian May <bam@snoopy.apana.org.au>
Date: 12 Feb 2001 09:58:20 +1100
In-Reply-To: joda@pdc.kth.se's message of "10 Feb 2001 14:51:18 +0100"
References: <200102091232.NAA21393@ytterboda.cs.umu.se><xofzofwt46q.fsf@blubb.pdc.kth.se><84pugr5odn.fsf@snoopy.apana.org.au><xoflmresl2h.fsf@blubb.pdc.kth.se>
Sender: owner-heimdal-discuss@sics.se
User-Agent: Gnus/5.0807 (Gnus v5.8.7) XEmacs/21.1 (Capitol Reef)

>>>>> "Johan" == Johan Danielsson <joda@pdc.kth.se> writes:

    Johan> Brian May <bam@snoopy.apana.org.au> writes:
    >> (note: this seems to put telnet in "Encryption is verbose" mode.  I am
    >> not sure if encryption is enabled or not by default if this message
    >> isn't shown.)

    Johan> Our telnet should always try to enable encryption. 

In that case, it seems that two different programs interpret this
configuration setting slightly differently:

rshd    - enable encryption.
telnetd - enable verbose messages about encryption.

That, IMHO could be confusing.
-- 
Brian May <bam@snoopy.apana.org.au>

References:
- Enforcing encryption
  - From: Ake Sandgren <ake@cs.umu.se>
- Re: Enforcing encryption
  - From: joda@pdc.kth.se (Johan Danielsson)
- Re: Enforcing encryption
  - From: Brian May <bam@snoopy.apana.org.au>
- Re: Enforcing encryption
  - From: joda@pdc.kth.se (Johan Danielsson)

Prev by Date: Re: Enforcing encryption
Next by Date: .k5command -- new stuff for rsh
Prev by thread: Re: Enforcing encryption
Next by thread: .k5command -- new stuff for rsh
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread