[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: linux pam module

To: Peter Magnusson <iocc@mailing-list.flashdance.cx>
Subject: Re: linux pam module
From: Richard Nyberg <rnyberg@it.su.se>
Date: Thu, 21 Feb 2002 11:14:59 +0100
Cc: heimdal discuss <heimdal-discuss@sics.se>
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.33L2.0202211050420.32370-100000@sysbabe>; from iocc@mailing-list.flashdance.cx on Thu, Feb 21, 2002 at 10:52:45am +0100
References: <20020221100716.A44192@gromit.it.su.se> <Pine.LNX.4.33L2.0202211050420.32370-100000@sysbabe>
Sender: owner-heimdal-discuss@sics.se
User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5.1i

> Thanks. It this the most stable and working pam module for linux at todays
> date?

Well, I suppose pam_unix.so is a tad more tested ;)

I really couldn't tell since I haven't tested any other kerberos pam module
at all. However, kpam _is_ stable and it _does_ work, so it's all a matter
of how you define "most stable and working".

We use kpam extensively at Stockholm University, not only on Linux but on
FreeBSD and Solaris too.

	-Richard

References:
- Re: linux pam module
  - From: Richard Nyberg <rnyberg@it.su.se>
- Re: linux pam module
  - From: Peter Magnusson <iocc@mailing-list.flashdance.cx>

Prev by Date: Re: linux pam module
Next by Date: Re: linux pam module
Prev by thread: Re: linux pam module
Next by thread: kadmin: Fatal: could not seed the random number generator Abort- core dumped
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread