[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Heimdal with Solaris ndbm works?

To: "Henry B. Hotz" <hotz@jpl.nasa.gov>
Subject: Re: Heimdal with Solaris ndbm works?
From: Love <lha@stacken.kth.se>
Date: Tue, 21 Oct 2003 06:55:24 +0200
Cc: heimdal-discuss@sics.se
In-Reply-To: <p05210600bbba0550c00b@[137.78.212.225]> (Henry B. Hotz'smessage of "Mon, 20 Oct 2003 14:41:38 -0700")
References: <Pine.LNX.4.33.0310201647210.14711-100000@flux.mse.jhu.edu><p05210600bbba0550c00b@[137.78.212.225]>
Sender: owner-heimdal-discuss@sics.se
User-Agent: Gnus/5.1002 (Gnus v5.10.2) Emacs/21.3 (berkeley-unix)


"Henry B. Hotz" <hotz@jpl.nasa.gov> writes:

> There's a comment in the Heimdal docs that it supports Solaris ndbm,
> but such a configuration was deprecated (I forget the exact
> words). Does anyone actually use this combination?
>
> Am I likely to see fewer problems on Solaris if I use the built-in
> ndbm, or if I install Berkeley DB2 or DB3?
>
> I assume /usr/ucbinclude/dbm.h & /usr/ucblib/libdbm.a is likely to be
> buggy and even less recommended than ndbm.

Last time I used dbm (ndbm interface, dbm_ functions) on Solaris 8, it leak
memory, it all stopped with we used db3 instead.

Love

PGP signature

References:
- Symbol reference errors heimdal-0.6, solaris 8
  - From: Elliot Metsger <emetsger@jhu.edu>
- Heimdal with Solaris ndbm works?
  - From: "Henry B. Hotz" <hotz@jpl.nasa.gov>

Prev by Date: Re: Symbol reference errors heimdal-0.6, solaris 8
Next by Date: Re: Symbol reference errors heimdal-0.6, solaris 8
Prev by thread: Heimdal with Solaris ndbm works?
Next by thread: Re: Symbol reference errors heimdal-0.6, solaris 8
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread