[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Can we get rid of kerb5 redefining macros?

To: Hajimu UMEMOTO <ume@mahoroba.org>
Subject: Re: Can we get rid of kerb5 redefining macros?
From: Love <lha@stacken.kth.se>
Date: Tue, 02 Dec 2003 13:08:24 +0100
Cc: heimdal-discuss@sics.se
In-Reply-To: <ygebrqspi5j.wl%ume@mahoroba.org> (Hajimu UMEMOTO's message of"Tue, 02 Dec 2003 02:22:32 +0900")
References: <20031201121134.GA4436@dragon.nuxi.com><ygebrqspi5j.wl%ume@mahoroba.org>
Sender: owner-heimdal-discuss@sics.se
User-Agent: Gnus/5.1002 (Gnus v5.10.2) Emacs/21.3 (berkeley-unix)


Hajimu UMEMOTO <ume@mahoroba.org> writes:

> Hi,
>
> FreeBSD 5-CURRENT switched Basic Socket Interface Extensions for IPv6
> from RFC 2553 to RFC 3493 (aka RFC 2553bis).  This obsoleted
> EAI_ADDRFAMILY and EAI_NODATA.  Now, EAI_* in our netdb.h is
> following:
[...]
> Unfortunately, heimdal referes EAI_ADDRFAMILY and EAI_NODATA, and is
> affected this change.  The following patch corresponds to this change.
> Could you please apply it to heimdal?
> Sorry but the diff is against heimdal in FreeBSD 5.2-BETA.

I commited something like the patch you proposed.

Love

http://people.su.se/~lha/patches/heimdal/rfc3493

PGP signature

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Can we get rid of kerb5 redefining macros?
  - From: Hajimu UMEMOTO <ume@mahoroba.org>

References:
- Re: Can we get rid of kerb5 redefining macros?
  - From: Hajimu UMEMOTO <ume@mahoroba.org>

Prev by Date: Re: problem: default realm in openssh
Next by Date: Re: Can we get rid of kerb5 redefining macros?
Prev by thread: Re: Can we get rid of kerb5 redefining macros?
Next by thread: Re: Can we get rid of kerb5 redefining macros?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread