[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: heimdal on tru64 unix peculiarities
- To: David Komanek <xdavid@lib-eth.natur.cuni.cz>
- Subject: Re: heimdal on tru64 unix peculiarities
- From: Dave Love <d.love@dl.ac.uk>
- Date: Thu, 01 Apr 2004 15:37:37 +0100
- Cc: heimdal-discuss@sics.se, ax@natur.cuni.cz
- In-Reply-To: <Pine.OSF.4.58.0403301629210.74565@lib-eth.natur.cuni.cz> (DavidKomanek's message of "Tue, 30 Mar 2004 16:53:36 +0200 (CEST)")
- References: <20040330130702.56543.qmail@web80810.mail.yahoo.com><Pine.OSF.4.58.0403301629210.74565@lib-eth.natur.cuni.cz>
- Sender: owner-heimdal-discuss@sics.se
- User-Agent: Gnus/5.1002 (Gnus v5.10.2) Emacs/21.2 (gnu/linux)
David Komanek <xdavid@lib-eth.natur.cuni.cz> writes:
> 1. using heimdal as OSF SIA modules produces ticket files which are never
> removed from the temp directory after the user is successfully logged in -
> what is the workaround for this except rm-ing thousands of files every
> hour ?
When I tried a long time ago, I couldn't get the Heimdal SIA module to
work. I've been using the one at
http://www.cit.uws.edu.au/~luke/software/sia_kerberosv5/, built
against MIT. I never got round to trying to make it work with
Heimdal. I can't get both Kerberos and LDAP working properly under
SIA, though.
> 2. heimdal seems to be much slower than kth-krb ver. 4. Does anyone have
> any experience with tuning heimdal ?
Heimdal kinit is effectively instant for me on T64 5.1B, and I don't
remember obvious slowness on earlier T64 versions.
> For example for kinit, truss shows
> the delay i scaused by about 64 subsequently trapped signals of value 14.
> Could it be related to random generator, which is not present as
> special device on the tru64 unix and is searched before and after this
> signal burst ?
For what it's worth, 5.1B has /dev/random and /dev/urandom.