[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Problem between versions 0.6-67 and 0.6-159 on SuSE

To: "Scott Simpson" <ssimpson@visionsolutions.com>
Subject: Re: Problem between versions 0.6-67 and 0.6-159 on SuSE
From: Love <lha@stacken.kth.se>
Date: Mon, 24 May 2004 21:30:01 +0200
Cc: "Johan Danielsson" <joda@pdc.kth.se>, <heimdal-discuss@sics.se>
In-Reply-To: <82A47638CDEE2947809EE34E2A378105222BCE@exchange.visionsolutions.com> (ScottSimpson's message of "Fri, 21 May 2004 13:40:37 -0700")
References: <82A47638CDEE2947809EE34E2A378105222BCE@exchange.visionsolutions.com>
Sender: owner-heimdal-discuss@sics.se
User-Agent: Gnus/5.1006 (Gnus v5.10.6) Emacs/21.3 (berkeley-unix)


"Scott Simpson" <ssimpson@visionsolutions.com> writes:

> The log says
>
> 2004-05-21T13:32:00 TGS-REQ ssimpson@VISIONSOLUTIONS.COM from
> IPv4:10.1.255.15 for host/vu15.visionsolutions.com@VISIONSOLUTIONS.COM
> 2004-05-21T13:32:00 Decoding transited encoding: KDC policy rejects
> request
> 2004-05-21T13:32:00 sending 161 bytes to IPv4:10.1.255.15
>
> Do you think it is having trouble decoding the packet that comes across?
> I tried without forwardable tickets (the -F flag) and I got the same
> behavior. Thanks.

Can you try building a heimdal 0.6.2 kdc and see if you still have the
problem with that code or it was just a merge error from SuSE when they
included the change.

Love

PGP signature

References:
- RE: Problem between versions 0.6-67 and 0.6-159 on SuSE
  - From: "Scott Simpson" <ssimpson@visionsolutions.com>

Prev by Date: Re: AFS Keyfile Problem
Next by Date: Re: AFS Keyfile Problem
Prev by thread: Re: Problem between versions 0.6-67 and 0.6-159 on SuSE
Next by thread: How KDC ensure the security of the key in its dbase
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread