[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: DB file size

To: Andrew Bacchi <bacchi@rpi.edu>
Subject: Re: DB file size
From: joda@pdc.kth.se (Johan Danielsson)
Date: Fri, 02 Jul 2004 22:10:28 +0200
Cc: "heimdal-discuss@sics.se" <heimdal-discuss@sics.se>
In-Reply-To: <1088773026.25452.6.camel@boreal.netel.rpi.edu> (AndrewBacchi's message of "02 Jul 2004 08:57:00 -0400")
References: <1088773026.25452.6.camel@boreal.netel.rpi.edu>
Sender: owner-heimdal-discuss@sics.se
User-Agent: Gnus/5.1002 (Gnus v5.10.2) Emacs/20.7 (berkeley-unix)

Andrew Bacchi <bacchi@rpi.edu> writes:

> There is a difference in the size of the heimdal.db files between
> the Master and Replication servers, the Rep server file being
> larger.  Both files contain the same number of principals, and the
> propagation takes place every 20 minutes.  So I can't see the reason
> for the size variation.  Any ideas?

Well, the entries in the slave copy will not necessarily be added in
the same order as in the master copy. Does ls -ls agree about the
size?

/Johan

References:
- DB file size
  - From: Andrew Bacchi <bacchi@rpi.edu>

Prev by Date: DB file size
Next by Date: Upgrading Heimdal Operational Mode with Minimal Interruption.
Prev by thread: DB file size
Next by thread: Upgrading Heimdal Operational Mode with Minimal Interruption.
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread