[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: multi-mechanism gssapi

To: lukeh@PADL.COM
Subject: Re: multi-mechanism gssapi
From: Jonathan Stone <jonathan@dsg.stanford.edu>
Date: Tue, 30 Nov 2004 12:22:22 -0800
Cc: heimdal-discuss@sics.se
In-reply-to: Your message of "Tue, 30 Nov 2004 09:11:34 +1100." <200411292211.iATMBYVg019552@au.padl.com>
Sender: owner-heimdal-discuss@sics.se



I see lots of references to dynamic-linker flags flags in the discussion
of multi-mechanism GSSAPI and mech-glue for Heimdal.

Luke, do the Heimdal multi-mech patches absolutely require a dynamic
linker?  Or will they continue to work for us troglodytes who (for
various good and sufficient reasons of our own), use Heimdal only with
statically-linked libraries, don't have dynamic linkers, and don't
have a dlopen(), &c?

References:
- Re: multi-mechanism gssapi
  - From: Luke Howard <lukeh@PADL.COM>

Prev by Date: Re: multi-mechanism gssapi
Prev by thread: Re: multi-mechanism gssapi
Next by thread: Re: multi-mechanism gssapi
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread