[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Safest DB modification to repeat.

To: "Henry B. Hotz" <hotz@jpl.nasa.gov>
Subject: Re: Safest DB modification to repeat.
From: Love Hörnquist Åstrand <lha@kth.se>
Date: Wed, 13 Apr 2005 16:25:16 +0200
Cc: Dave Love <d.love@dl.ac.uk>, heimdal-discuss@sics.se
In-Reply-To: <ab37ccc55c5d3b35e8d3454ff7e99e52@jpl.nasa.gov> (Henry B.Hotz's message of "Tue, 12 Apr 2005 15:34:43 -0700")
References: <e490221b6e6f3a8dea72ed227f0c0cff@jpl.nasa.gov><rzqacoamvhi.fsf@loveshack> <ambr8kov18.fsf@nutcracker.it.su.se><ab37ccc55c5d3b35e8d3454ff7e99e52@jpl.nasa.gov>
Sender: owner-heimdal-discuss@sics.se
User-Agent: Gnus/5.1006 (Gnus v5.10.6) Emacs/21.3 (berkeley-unix)


"Henry B. Hotz" <hotz@jpl.nasa.gov> writes:

>> More modern versions of the iprop protocol, have a keep alive
>> message  that
>> that the slave sends now and then to make sure the server knows its
>> alive. We used to have problems there wasn't enough updates going
>> over  the
>> connection, so monitoring didn't pick up slaves that died.
>>
>
> SO_KEEPALIVE?

I wanted to know that the application was alive too.

Love

PGP signature

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Safest DB modification to repeat.
  - From: "Henry B. Hotz" <hotz@jpl.nasa.gov>

References:
- Re: Safest DB modification to repeat.
  - From: Dave Love <d.love@dl.ac.uk>
- Re: Safest DB modification to repeat.
  - From: Love Hörnquist Åstrand <lha@kth.se>
- Re: Safest DB modification to repeat.
  - From: "Henry B. Hotz" <hotz@jpl.nasa.gov>

Prev by Date: Re: Use of different keytabs before gss_acquire_cred
Next by Date: Re: Why Samba didn't use pam to hook into cracklib
Prev by thread: Re: Safest DB modification to repeat.
Next by thread: Re: Safest DB modification to repeat.
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread