Re: heimdal 0.7pre2

[Love Hörnquist Åstrand <lha@kth.se>]

Miroslav Ruda <ruda@ics.muni.cz> writes:

> Love Hörnquist Åstrand wrote:
>> Miroslav Ruda <ruda@ics.muni.cz> writes:
>>
>>>Love Hörnquist Åstrand wrote:
>>>
>>>>Run "make check" before installing, I've added quite a lot of new test
>>>>programs, and some of them might be to restrictive.
>>>>Please send bug reports to heimdal-discuss so we don't get lots of
>>>>duplicate problems to heimdal-bugs.
>>>
>>>RSH_BUFSIZE was changed to 5*1024 to be compatible with MIT. However,
>>>because 0.4 version of heimdal client was using 16*1024 size, rshd is not
>>>able to handle large packets from older client. What about to have
>>>shorter RSH_BUFSIZE in client and larger in daemon?
>> Can you test if this solve the problem ?
>
> Works fine, thanks.

Ok, I commited that patch.

> While I was checking rsh/rcp, I have found other incompatibility. When
> new version of rcp starts rcp -t on remote side (using rsh), it
> doesn't set
> full path for rcp (as was in 0.4version). Because I have heimdal in
> /usr/heimdal, rcp was not found. I understand that rcp on remote side
> can be located in different directory, but is there any way how to set
> PATH for rshd?
> Is changing of _PATH_DEFPATH in rsh/rsh_locl.h expected way?
>
> And while looking  into PATH problem, I have found rcp/rcp_lock.h where is
> #define _PATH_RSH       "/usr/bin/rsh"
>
> Having heimdal in /usr/heimdal I'm not surprised that remote-to_remote
> copy doesn't work:

At least we can change the code to, but Johan know how this is supposed to
work better then me, so I'll wait for his comment.

Love

--- appl/rcp/rcp_locl.h
+++ appl/rcp/rcp_locl.h
@@ -61,4 +61,4 @@
 #include "extern.h"
 
 #define	_PATH_CP	"/bin/cp"
-#define	_PATH_RSH	"/usr/bin/rsh"
+#define	_PATH_RSH	BINDIR "/rsh"

PGP signature