[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Future of kerberised telnet, login, rsh, ftp?
Andrew Bartlett wrote:
> As a relative newcomer to the kerberos world, I'm wondering what the
> future of tools like kerberised telnet, rsh, ftp and the like is. It
> seems from my viewpoint that OpenSSH (with the gssapi mode) and things
> like pam_krb5 have taken over from these tools.
>
> I note that recent security advisories for both distributions were in
> these 'utility' programs (telnet, ftpd etc) rather than in the core
> kerberos code.
>
> Do these tools still have wide use? Is there a plan to phase them out,
> or maintain them separately to the main kerberos distribution?
>
> (This was brought up by a look we are taking on samba-technical about
> what proportion of Heimdal to import, with a strong view to avoid
> including these apps).
Just echoing that. I avoid using them as well, and we often run into
difficulties porting these programs to our supported platforms. Their
base code seems to be quite ancient, and ssh has supserseded all of
their usefulness.
--
-- Howard Chu
Chief Architect, Symas Corp. Director, Highland Sun
http://www.symas.com http://highlandsun.com/hyc
Symas: Premier OpenSource Development and Support
- Prev by Date:
Future of kerberised telnet, login, rsh, ftp?
- Next by Date:
Re: Future of kerberised telnet, login, rsh, ftp?
- Prev by thread:
Future of kerberised telnet, login, rsh, ftp?
- Next by thread:
Re: Future of kerberised telnet, login, rsh, ftp?
- Index(es):