[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Future of kerberised telnet, login, rsh, ftp?
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Tarjei Huse schrieb:
> Hi,
>
>>>The biggest issue is with the fact that few clients are able of using it
>>>(Evolution claims support
>>
>>Evolution's GSSAPI support works.
>
> Has anyone looked at the Thunderbird code? I'm just wondering how hard
> it would be to add kerberos support and a writeable ldapadressbook to
> TB.
I had a look at that, and found that there's no concept in the code,
for HTTP I think they use SSPI on windows, I think the first thing
thunderbird needs is a generic class for GSSAPI, SASL... (and also but seperate SSL/TLS)
so that the same code will be used for LDAP,HTTP,IMAP,SMTP,POP3...
and that they use the same generic wrapper class on windows and unix.
- --
metze
Stefan Metzmacher <metze at samba.org> www.samba.org
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.3-nr1 (Windows XP)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iD8DBQFCzDRRm70gjA5TCD8RAixEAJ9HqU26kRbhjnGBPePpe84OnauLwwCgmiEt
aRPxqsQE+37Mj/HgEsvDhP4=
=yOGK
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
- References:
- Future of kerberised telnet, login, rsh, ftp?
- From: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
- Re: Future of kerberised telnet, login, rsh, ftp?
- From: Brian May <bam@snoopy.apana.org.au>
- Re: Future of kerberised telnet, login, rsh, ftp?
- From: Gémes Géza <geza@kzsdabas.sulinet.hu>
- Re: Future of kerberised telnet, login, rsh, ftp?
- From: Adam Tauno Williams <adam@morrison-ind.com>
- Re: Future of kerberised telnet, login, rsh, ftp?
- From: Tarjei Huse <tarjei@nu.no>
- Prev by Date:
Re: Future of kerberised telnet, login, rsh, ftp?
- Next by Date:
Re: Future of kerberised telnet, login, rsh, ftp?
- Prev by thread:
Re: Future of kerberised telnet, login, rsh, ftp?
- Next by thread:
Re: Future of kerberised telnet, login, rsh, ftp?
- Index(es):