On Tue, 2005-09-27 at 16:48 -0400, Gedaliah Wolosh wrote: > Has there been any movement on this? We would very much like to have > this ability. I'm also very interested in this, for obvious reasons. I'm happy to work on any patches, and get them into lorikeet-heimdal at least :-) > ---------- Forwarded message ---------- > Date: Wed, 8 Jun 2005 23:12:52 +1000 > From: Luke Howard <lukeh@PADL.COM> > To: ahaupt@ifh.de > Cc: feiler@uni-hohenheim.de, heimdal-discuss@sics.se, mack@uni-hohenheim.de > Subject: Re: Locking of principales due to unsuccessfull attempts > > > > > >Well, years ago, I asked the same question. That time I was told that the > >current database model does not support account locking (but Love and > >Johan will probably know better...). > > For our XAD identity server, which supports account locking, we added > an auditing code path to the Heimdal KDC. I mentioned it to Love some > time ago, I'm happy to commit it once approved. > > -- Luke > > -- > -- Andrew Bartlett http://samba.org/~abartlet/ Samba Developer, SuSE Labs, Novell Inc. http://suse.de Authentication Developer, Samba Team http://samba.org Student Network Administrator, Hawker College http://hawkerc.net
This is a digitally signed message part