[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Mechglue

To: Michael B Allen <mba2000@ioplex.com>
Subject: Re: Mechglue
From: Love Hörnquist Åstrand <lha@kth.se>
Date: Tue, 25 Oct 2005 17:54:46 +0200
Cc: heimdal-discuss@sics.se
In-Reply-To: <20051022225555.6a90d017.mba2000@ioplex.com> (Michael B.Allen's message of "Sat, 22 Oct 2005 22:55:55 -0400")
References: <20051022225555.6a90d017.mba2000@ioplex.com>
Sender: owner-heimdal-discuss@sics.se
User-Agent: Gnus/5.1006 (Gnus v5.10.6) Emacs/22.0.50 (darwin)

Michael B Allen <mba2000@ioplex.com> writes:

> Hey,

Thanks for the comments, I'll follow them up later when reading more of the
mech-glue code.

> 8) What's the plan for the mechglue-branch? I'm just wondering what
> parts deserve attention and what parts are maintained elsewhere.

The plan is to merge the code into the main branch, but I want to review
the code first. PK-INIT have been in the way so far.

Love

PGP signature

References:
- Mechglue
  - From: Michael B Allen <mba2000@ioplex.com>

Prev by Date: Re: pkinit, openssl engines, and cert retrieval.
Next by Date: Re: ASN1_* Errors Returned from GSSAPI Functions
Prev by thread: Re: Mechglue
Next by thread: No Subject
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread