On Tue, 2005-10-25 at 17:56 +0200, Love Hörnquist Åstrand wrote: > Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org> writes: > > > Actually, I was more worried by the fact that I just got a numeric error > > message, because the asn1 error table was used, and it was not loaded. > > I'm not sure if I should have done that (as the application), the > > kerberos libarary should have, or I should have expected only krb5 error > > returns from the krb5 libs. > > I think you should expect com_error errors from the kerberos library, how > did you manage to not load the asn1 errors ? I don't know. What was I mean to do? This part of the system should be standard krb5... > > I'm not worried what the client gets sent, but what I see in my > > application logs and logic. > > If your application avoid sending broken packets, it wont see them :) This is a matter of when the client was sending garbage, the server error messages/logs were hard to understand. Andrew Bartlett -- Andrew Bartlett http://samba.org/~abartlet/ Samba Developer, SuSE Labs, Novell Inc. http://suse.de Authentication Developer, Samba Team http://samba.org Student Network Administrator, Hawker College http://hawkerc.net
This is a digitally signed message part