[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Comments on LDAP support in heimdal
- To: Howard Chu <hyc@highlandsun.com>
- Subject: Re: Comments on LDAP support in heimdal
- From: Love Hörnquist Åstrand <lha@kth.se>
- Date: Thu, 03 Nov 2005 23:21:51 +0100
- Cc: Lars Kellogg-Stedman <lars@oddbit.com>, heimdal-discuss@sics.se
- In-Reply-To: <43656C7D.5090107@highlandsun.com> (Howard Chu's message of"Sun, 30 Oct 2005 16:59:41 -0800")
- References: <c27faacf0510301556m1ee0fe5ete517a537606499e7@mail.gmail.com><43656C7D.5090107@highlandsun.com>
- Sender: owner-heimdal-discuss@sics.se
- User-Agent: Gnus/5.1006 (Gnus v5.10.6) Emacs/22.0.50 (darwin)
Howard Chu <hyc@highlandsun.com> writes:
> While we're on this subject, it might be a better idea to make to
> treat the dbname as a URI. Then we could make the path to the socket
> explicit, e.g. dbname =
> ldapi://%2fvar%2fheimdal%2fldap/dc=example,dc=com
Indeed, next time I get a ldap-setup, I'll try my patch that implements
this behavior.
Love
PGP signature