[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Using John the Ripper with Heimdal
- To: Ken Hornstein <kenh@cmf.nrl.navy.mil>
- Subject: Re: Using John the Ripper with Heimdal
- From: Love Hörnquist Åstrand <lha@kth.se>
- Date: Fri, 03 Feb 2006 13:01:17 +0100
- Cc: heimdal-discuss@sics.se
- In-Reply-To: <200512151601.jBFG1Enr021821@ginger.cmf.nrl.navy.mil> (KenHornstein's message of "Thu, 15 Dec 2005 11:01:15 -0500")
- References: <200512151601.jBFG1Enr021821@ginger.cmf.nrl.navy.mil>
- Sender: owner-heimdal-discuss@sics.se
- User-Agent: Gnus/5.1006 (Gnus v5.10.6) Emacs/22.0.50 (darwin)
Ken Hornstein <kenh@cmf.nrl.navy.mil> writes:
>>How about posting the reference? I can't find it, and it's not at all
>>clear to me what the patch expects. Also it seems only to deal with
>>DES3.
>
> I was curious about that as well. AFAICT, it wants encrypted TGTs off
> the wire (I'm not sure if it just wants the encrypted part, or the
> whole thing); well, I guess technically a TGT itself isn't useful for
> a password cracker, it probably wants an AS-REP.
>
> This would be useful if you were an attacker and was sniffing the wire
> for responses from the KDC. It's not so useful if your an admin and
> want to run it against an existing database.
>
> Personally, I think running cracklib during password changes is a lot more
> effective (you _do_ have a password changing policy, don't you? :-) ).
Sure we do, but I don't like cracklib very much, it think its too nice. Any
other tools people are using ?
Love
PGP signature