[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

SPKI (Was: .k5command -- new stuff for rsh)

To: Brian May <bam@snoopy.apana.org.au>
Subject: SPKI (Was: .k5command -- new stuff for rsh)
From: "Kurt D. Zeilenga" <Kurt@OpenLDAP.Org>
Date: Mon, 12 Feb 2001 14:59:57 -0800
Cc: heimdal-discuss@sics.se
In-Reply-To: <84zofrpnva.fsf@snoopy.apana.org.au>
References: <joda@pdc.kth.se's message of "12 Feb 2001 14:53:01 +0100"><200102121323.f1CDNou64841@lists.su.se><xofg0hk80ua.fsf@blubb.pdc.kth.se>
Sender: owner-heimdal-discuss@sics.se

At 08:55 AM 2/13/01 +1100, Brian May wrote:
>The biggest problems with SPKI right now though is that a) no good
>implementation exists, b) no traffic on mailing list for several
>months (I will have to try and talk to Carl Ellison about that).

IIRC, the IETF SPKI WG has concluded.

Kurt

Follow-Ups:
- Re: SPKI (Was: .k5command -- new stuff for rsh)
  - From: David Margrave <davidma@amazon.com>

References:
- .k5command -- new stuff for rsh
  - From: Leif Johansson <leifj@it.su.se>
- Re: .k5command -- new stuff for rsh
  - From: joda@pdc.kth.se (Johan Danielsson)
- Re: .k5command -- new stuff for rsh
  - From: Brian May <bam@snoopy.apana.org.au>

Prev by Date: No Subject
Next by Date: Re: Heimdal / MIT incompatibilities
Prev by thread: Re: .k5command -- new stuff for rsh
Next by thread: Re: SPKI (Was: .k5command -- new stuff for rsh)
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread