[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: SPKI (Was: .k5command -- new stuff for rsh)

To: "Kurt D. Zeilenga" <Kurt@OpenLDAP.Org>
Subject: Re: SPKI (Was: .k5command -- new stuff for rsh)
From: David Margrave <davidma@amazon.com>
Date: Mon, 12 Feb 2001 15:42:28 -0800
Cc: Brian May <bam@snoopy.apana.org.au>, heimdal-discuss@sics.se
Organization: Amazon.com, Inc.
References: <joda@pdc.kth.se's message of "12 Feb 2001 14:53:01 +0100"> <200102121323.f1CDNou64841@lists.su.se> <xofg0hk80ua.fsf@blubb.pdc.kth.se> <5.0.2.1.0.20010212144914.00a81b70@router.boolean.net>
Sender: owner-heimdal-discuss@sics.se


entrust has an implementation of the SPKI mech.  they're the only one as
far as i know.


"Kurt D. Zeilenga" wrote:

> At 08:55 AM 2/13/01 +1100, Brian May wrote:
> >The biggest problems with SPKI right now though is that a) no good
> >implementation exists, b) no traffic on mailing list for several
> >months (I will have to try and talk to Carl Ellison about that).
>
> IIRC, the IETF SPKI WG has concluded.
>
> Kurt

Follow-Ups:
- Re: SPKI (Was: .k5command -- new stuff for rsh)
  - From: Brian May <bam@snoopy.apana.org.au>

References:
- .k5command -- new stuff for rsh
  - From: Leif Johansson <leifj@it.su.se>
- Re: .k5command -- new stuff for rsh
  - From: joda@pdc.kth.se (Johan Danielsson)
- SPKI (Was: .k5command -- new stuff for rsh)
  - From: "Kurt D. Zeilenga" <Kurt@OpenLDAP.Org>

Prev by Date: Re: Heimdal / MIT incompatibilities
Next by Date: Re: SPKI (Was: .k5command -- new stuff for rsh)
Prev by thread: SPKI (Was: .k5command -- new stuff for rsh)
Next by thread: Re: SPKI (Was: .k5command -- new stuff for rsh)
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread