[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: gss_wrap_size_limit()

To: lukeh@PADL.COM
Subject: Re: gss_wrap_size_limit()
From: Love <lha@stacken.kth.se>
Date: Fri, 06 Jun 2003 01:12:29 +0200
Cc: heimdal-discuss@sics.se
In-Reply-To: <200306032318.JAA76305@au.padl.com> (Luke Howard's message of"Wed, 4 Jun 2003 09:18:18 +1000")
References: <200306032318.JAA76305@au.padl.com>
Sender: owner-heimdal-discuss@sics.se
User-Agent: Gnus/5.1002 (Gnus v5.10.2) Emacs/21.3 (berkeley-unix)

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1


Luke Howard <lukeh@PADL.COM> writes:

> After some minor fixes, the issues I'm left with in running the test
> suite are:

Ok, so, running current tree, the only issue I get is:

[...]
Observed initial lifetimes for established security contexts:
*FAILING* SAP constraint:
==> Acceptor  context and credentials lifetime mismatch (52)!
[...]

Love
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.2 (NetBSD)
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=zMDx
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

References:
- Re: gss_wrap_size_limit()
  - From: Luke Howard <lukeh@PADL.COM>

Prev by Date: Re: gss_wrap_size_limit()
Next by Date: FW: memory leak in some Kerberos APIs?
Prev by thread: Re: gss_wrap_size_limit()
Next by thread: Re: gss_wrap_size_limit()
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread