[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Future of kerberised telnet, login, rsh, ftp?

>>>>> "Ilia" == Ilia Chipitsine <ilia@paramon.ru> writes:

    Ilia> so, I wouldn't consider telnet+pam_krb5 as replacement for
    Ilia> kerberised telnet.

...but would you consider ssh with builtin support for Kerberos
(whether GSSAPI, SASL, or whatever other acronym you care to invent)
is a replacement for Kerberos telnet?

If the answer is yes, then why do we need to keep telnet and telnetd?

If the answer is no, then why not?

Is there anything you can do in telnet that you can't do in ssh?
-- 
Brian May <bam@snoopy.apana.org.au>