[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Future of kerberised telnet, login, rsh, ftp?

To: Brian May <bam@snoopy.apana.org.au>
Subject: Re: Future of kerberised telnet, login, rsh, ftp?
From: "Brandon S. Allbery KF8NH" <allbery@ece.cmu.edu>
Date: Wed, 06 Jul 2005 19:54:42 -0400
Cc: heimdal-discuss@sics.se
In-Reply-To: <sa4slyrses2.fsf@snoopy.microcomaustralia.com.au>
References: <1120612841.6159.119.camel@amy.samba4.abartlet.net> <20050706092811.X89758@office.paramon.ru> <sa4slyrses2.fsf@snoopy.microcomaustralia.com.au>
Sender: owner-heimdal-discuss@sics.se

On Thu, 2005-07-07 at 09:20 +1000, Brian May wrote:
> Is there anything you can do in telnet that you can't do in ssh?

Recover when sshd is hosed / not running.  Backup access mechanisms
matter.

-- 
brandon s. allbery   [linux,solaris,freebsd,perl]      allbery@kf8nh.com
system administrator      [WAY too many hats]        allbery@ece.cmu.edu
electrical and computer engineering, carnegie mellon univ.         KF8NH

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Sticky authentication/authorisation issues
  - From: Brian May <bam@snoopy.apana.org.au>
- Re: Future of kerberised telnet, login, rsh, ftp?
  - From: Brian May <bam@snoopy.apana.org.au>

References:
- Future of kerberised telnet, login, rsh, ftp?
  - From: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
- Re: Future of kerberised telnet, login, rsh, ftp?
  - From: Ilia Chipitsine <ilia@paramon.ru>
- Re: Future of kerberised telnet, login, rsh, ftp?
  - From: Brian May <bam@snoopy.apana.org.au>

Prev by Date: Re: Kerberos support in standard services
Next by Date: Re: Kerberos support in standard services
Prev by thread: Re: Future of kerberised telnet, login, rsh, ftp?
Next by thread: Re: Sticky authentication/authorisation issues
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread