[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Future of kerberised telnet, login, rsh, ftp?
>>>>> "jay" == jay alvarez <kerber0sb0y@yahoo.com> writes:
jay> I'm not an expert in these technologies but as far as can
jay> tell, I remember there is this article which teaches people
jay> how to read/send emails using pop/smtp by just telneting to a
jay> specific port, in these case 110/25, I followed the rest of
jay> the instructions and it worked! but with ssh... I haven't
jay> tried yet, perhaps you would want to :)
You don't need a Kerberos telnet for that, and old telnet will do.
You can also use nc (net cat) too.
For SSL connections (e.g. https) use "openssl s_client".
--
Brian May <bam@snoopy.apana.org.au>
- Prev by Date:
Re: Future of kerberised telnet, login, rsh, ftp?
- Next by Date:
Re: Future of kerberised telnet, login, rsh, ftp?
- Prev by thread:
Re: Future of kerberised telnet, login, rsh, ftp?
- Next by thread:
Re: Future of kerberised telnet, login, rsh, ftp?
- Index(es):