[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Smbk5pwd and Heimdal 0.7 not playing nice?

To: heimdal-discuss@sics.se
Subject: Re: Smbk5pwd and Heimdal 0.7 not playing nice?
From: Brian May <bam@snoopy.apana.org.au>
Date: Thu, 04 Aug 2005 08:10:05 +1000
In-Reply-To: <200508031856.j73Iu2ii018791@ares.gofti.com> (Perry Nguyen's message of "Wed, 3 Aug 2005 11:56:01 -0700")
Mail-Followup-To: heimdal-discuss@sics.se
References: <42F028A8.6020501@highlandsun.com><200508031856.j73Iu2ii018791@ares.gofti.com>
Sender: owner-heimdal-discuss@sics.se
User-Agent: T-gnus/6.17.2 (based on No Gnus v0.2) SEMI/1.14.6 (Maruoka) FLIM/1.14.6 (Marutamachi) APEL/10.6 Emacs/21.4 (i386-pc-linux-gnu) MULE/5.0 (SAKAKI)

>>>>> "Perry" == Perry Nguyen <pfnguyen@best.com> writes:

    Perry>  I guess that's a good point, the MIT krb5 and Heimdal krb5
    Perry> libs cannot co-exist in the same executable.

This isn't a problem in Debian; both shared libraries were modified to
use versioned symbols some time ago.

Otherwise just using a PAM module that was compiled for the other
Kerberos implementation could be a pain, as the symbols would conflict
in the different libraries.
-- 
Brian May <bam@snoopy.apana.org.au>

References:
- Re: Smbk5pwd and Heimdal 0.7 not playing nice?
  - From: Howard Chu <hyc@highlandsun.com>
- RE: Smbk5pwd and Heimdal 0.7 not playing nice?
  - From: "Perry Nguyen" <pfnguyen@best.com>

Prev by Date: RE: Smbk5pwd and Heimdal 0.7 not playing nice?
Next by Date: Making my own keys
Prev by thread: RE: Smbk5pwd and Heimdal 0.7 not playing nice?
Next by thread: Re: Smbk5pwd and Heimdal 0.7 not playing nice?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread